Daniel Kim’s Dilemma (A) Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Daniel Kim was considering blowing the whistle on his friend, the CEO of a fast-growing startup where Kim had spent most of his professional career. When Kim joined the firm, called Cardio-Metric, in 2002, it consisted of seven young engineers (including its two 25-year-old creators) working from a one-bedroom Minneapolis apartment.

Cardio Metric's success, however, hidden troubling internal developments. Since 2002, the CEO's management style had progressed from unconventional to questionable to egregious. Kim, Cardiometric's on-and-off CFO, had repeatedly confronted the CEO over his conduct-including billing big purchases with no clear business purpose to Cardio Metric and presenting unrealistic financial projections to investors-but the CEO disregarded Kim's concerns and ordered him not to share them with others at the company.

By April 2009, Kim believed the issue had grown out of control, and he was considering disclosing the CEO's activities to the board of directors and a team of external auditors. There was much at stake. Kim's disclosure endanger Kim's own function at the business would certainly ruin his friendship with all the CEO, and even jeopardize the future of Cardiometric itself.

PUBLICATION DATE: April 13, 2011 PRODUCT #: 411009-PDF-ENG

This is just an excerpt. This case is about ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Share This

SALE SALE

Save Up To

30%

IN ONLINE CASE STUDY

FOR FREE CASES AND PROJECTS INCLUDING EXCITING DEALS PLEASE REGISTER YOURSELF !!

Register now and save up to 30%.