Intuition vs. Deliberation: How Decision Making Can Be Improved Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Research by academics that were esteemed has uncovered a broad variety of biases that harass decision makers on a regular basis. Thanks to them, we understand that predictable errors lead people to perpetrate sub-optimal actions on a regular basis, accepting the jobs that are wrong and ranging from economy for retirement to participating in gratuitous battle.

Regrettably, we have yet to uncover systematic strategies to help people behave more optimally and overcome these prejudices. The writers get started on this route, focusing on strategies that can result in better decisions, which involve leveraging the human tendency to default to 'Type 1' -- or automatic -- mental processing.

PUBLICATION DATE: January 01, 2010 PRODUCT #: ROT099-PDF-ENG

This is just an excerpt. This case is about STRATEGY about STRATEGY & EXECUTION

Intuition vs. Deliberation: How Decision Making Can Be Improved Case Solution Other Similar Case Solutions like

Intuition vs. Deliberation: How Decision Making Can Be Improved

Share This