Greenpeace vs. Ford: Catalytic Converters Come to the U.K. Case Solution
Program that an advanced awareness of and a pro-active participation in the general public policy making procedure, can avoid a business discovering on its own in a no-win job, where it seems opposing environmental management.
Takes a look at the dispute in between Ford U.K. and Greenpeace. Ford had actually chosen not to provide automobiles with catalytic rippings tools in the U.K., choosing rather to promote advancement of its lean combust innovation. Greenpeace intended Ford for an energetic public connections attack, which led to Ford lastly presenting catalytic converters, even though whether since of or in antipathy of Greenpeace is unsettled to concern.
published: 01 Jan 1990
This is just an excerpt. This case is about Economics
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Global Software Industry in 2006
Emotion and Creativity at Work
Protecting Foreign Investors
Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does It Pay to Be Green
Note on the Canadian Transportation Industry
Rubicon Programs Corporate Strategy (Video) DVD
Turkey: Securing Stability in a Rough Neighborhood
Banking on Germany
Planet Starbucks (A)
Perspectives on Terrorism
