Under-Reported Impact of Age Discrimination and Its Threat to Business Vitality Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA, 29 USCA, 621) is credited with helping to eliminate many egregious forms of age discrimination in employment. For example, before the ADEA was adopted 37 years ago, it was common for job ads to the list of restrictions on age, pointing to people over 40 need not apply. Across-the-board mandatory retirement policy went unanswered. Despite the progress in these areas since the establishment ADEA, it remains to be seen whether the ADEA completed he intended to do. Has it been proven to be an effective tool to eliminate undue prejudice, that make it difficult for older workers to reach its full potential? Was it provided adequate compensation for victims of discrimination? A snapshot of the current conditions of work, to gain perspective. Based on extensive interviews with scientists, employment lawyers, advocates for older workers, and older workers themselves, this demonstrates the need for reforms. He believes that in the legal environment tilted toward employers, older workers continue to face prejudice and stereotypes that most victims of discrimination are not recovered, and the lack of public concern for such discrimination may be more costly in the future, employers are looking for older workers to fill the gaps projected workforce. "Hide
by Robert J. Grossman Source: Business Horizons 8 pages. Publication Date: January 15, 2005. Prod. #: BH145-PDF-ENG

Under-Reported Impact of Age Discrimination and Its Threat to Business Vitality Case Solution Other Similar Case Solutions like

Under-Reported Impact of Age Discrimination and Its Threat to Business Vitality

Share This