Efficient Budget Allocation Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Efficient Budget Allocation Case Study Solution

The greatest variance source in the safety of airline was not inevitably the type of operations or related aircraft equipment, but the actual cost that tended to originate from the safety culture of the company within the aviation system. It was not important for the smaller air travel company which operated on limited budget to spend huge amounts of money on the company’s safety culture; therefore, the benefits gained from the implementation of the initiatives such as safety management program e.g. Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) to reduce runway excursions or incursions would help the smaller company with improved professional services provided to their customers, and improved operational safety as well. Regardless of the safety program type used by an organization, it was significant to evaluate on the periodic basis whether the safety management program was effectively improving safety performance or not.

In addition to this, the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) was highly related to a Crew Resource Management Training (CRM). The data extracted from the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) most likely served the real time picture of the operations of safety systems that guided the strategies of the company in regards to training, safety and operations; hence,con centering to minimize the effects of runway incursion or excursion events.

The cost of implementing, as well as expanding the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) program was essential because an audit and its monitoring must happen on a continuous basis. Evaluations of an airfield organization’s security and safety programs were highly responsible for the reduction in the accident rates or runway excursion and incursion events.Safety program continuous monitoring and audits also happened to be core factors of the safety management system for almost any airfield organization(Thomas, 2012).

The Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) allowed most companies to conduct safety risk assessments for evaluating certain risks that were posited by the operational changes such as:

  1. Operations in lowered visibility conditions as compared to the currently permitted operational environment under normal conditions.
  2. The density and volume of the aircraft increases significantly.
  3. Changes in the aerodrome layout i.e. taxiways, new runways, and the aprons are brought into operations(Klinect, 2003).

Also, the efficient allocation of budget to Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) allowed a company to conduct their run way safety awareness campaigns,which would have likely focused on specific safety issues and/or mitigation efforts. Furthermore, it allowed the company to implement improved global reporting formats that were specifically used for reporting and assessing the condition of the runway surface. Another benefit of a viable safety awareness campaign is that it ensures that employees and staff are afforded training, which in turn instills expertise that comes from routine or repeated use. Finally, airfield safety awareness also allowed the company to ensure that runway conditions were reported in a timely manner, especially when the runway was deemed hazardous.(Khoshkhoo, 2013).

In addition to this, a company should have allocated its budget to the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) because it enabled other organizations to review the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to make sure that procedures were applicable to the aviation operations;and therefore ensured they were tailored to fit the operations, and were up to date. A company also used the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) assessment to identify the deficiencies in the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and its compliance.

There were many airlines which found it was cost effective to conduct a Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) on airline parts of operation. This data was presented to the management of the organization, which included:

  1. Areas of operations
  2. Training
  3. Standards
  4. Safety

The report generated after conducting the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) explained the safety issues and it analyzed the data, but the solution was better provided by the experts. It is important to note that the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) directed the attention of the organization to the most significant and inevitable safety related issues discovered during everyday line operations. Also, the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)full potential can only be realized when the willingness and commitment of the company exists, and the collected and supported data and information is seriously acted upon(Murray, 2011).

There was a need to collect the data as well as analyze it on a routine basis. This should have been required so that the safety initiatives could be sustained, and the company identified the target for marking improvements.The Safety Change Process (SCP) was helpful in keeping the company working together for achieving the same objectives regarding safety, and to help prevent or mitigate runway incursion and excursion events. The Safety Change Process (SCP) contributed to enhance a viable safety culture by maximizing capabilities of the future and current program initiatives(Earl, 2012)...........


This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.


Share This


Save Up To




Register now and save up to 30%.