Through The Eyes Of A Whistleblower Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Question 1

Who is Sherry Hunt? What is the challenge she faces? And what are her values and motivations at this moment in time?

Sherry Hunt is the Vice President and underwriter at CitiMortgage. She used to work hard, always prided herself on following the rules and built a successful and as long career in the mortgage business. She began her career as a mortgage processor in a small bank in Alaska. It was in November 2004, when she accepted the post of chief underwriter and vice president.

Sherry Hunt was facing a very critical challenge while working at CitiMortgage and her situation has been worsening as the time moves on. The team, which has been led by Hunt, always found that all the loans, which were being approved by Citi and had already been purchased by the lenders, were found to have defects in them. It has been found that that the loan officers sometimes filledin the numbers themselves. For instance, when they were filling out the application forms and the stated income loans, which had no back up documentation, then they would think by themselves what level of income they need to fill in so that the loan is approved according to the credit policy of the bank. Whether the borrower earned that income or not, the loan officers would write that income in the loan application.

When the loan officers were informed about their mistake, they fought with the underwriter about the found the problems. They never took Hunt seriously. The culture of Citi was another problem for Hunt especially the constant changes in the upper management and squashing of the policies, which got into the way of increasing the loan rates. Hunt has been isolated in the quality control unit where she witnessed several frauds taking place at Citi. Around 80 to 90 percent of the loans were confirmed as fraud by Hunt and her team.

Through the eyes of the whistle blower Harvard Case Solution & Analysis case study solution

Now the challenge, which was faced by Hunt, was how to take a stand against the fraud taking place at Citi, whom should she inform and how. She was a womanwho worked in this business since 1986 and she had always stood by the book and followed the rules strictly. Her values guided her motivations and she never wanted to take decisions, which are not moral and unethical. However, her motivation right now to make the right decision depended on her job security. She had been applying for jobs for almost a year but never heard back. Therefore, she had to take a right stand now and make a clear, ethical and moral decision.

Question 2

Why do you think nobody has within Citigroup- except Bowen and Hunt -  has blown the whistle thus far, when fraud and misreporting were pervasive (e.g., QA’s reporting in Citi’s Irving Office: QC’s reporting in Citi’s O’Fallon, MO, and Ann Arbor, MI Offices; fraudulent loans being submitted from Citi’s correspondent lenders across the nation)?

There are a number of reasons due to which nobody within Citigroup except, Bowne and Hunt had blown the whistle so far. First, the compensation system was responsible for this..................

This is just a sample partical work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution.

Other Similar Case Solutions like

Through The Eyes Of A Whistleblower

Share This