Arundel Partners Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Arundel Partners Case Study Solution 

A group of financial investors is acquiring the maintenance rights connected with movies created by at least one significant films studio. Real rights are to be bought before movies are made. Arundel needs to think of a choice to either buy all the spin-off rights for a studio's whole creation amid a particular time frame or to buy a particular number of significant movies. The organization's success is dependent on the value that it pays for a procedure of maintenance rights.

Arundel's proposition includes a net present value identifying every motion picture creating organization. Keeping in mind the end goal to determine the climate, Arundel could generate profit by purchasing motion picture continuation rights, however it is dependent on whether the new present estimation of the organization's motion pictures is higher than the assessed 2 million required for each film in order to purchase the rights.

Arundel is generally used to educate the idea of genuine decision in business decisions as well as it is utilized when appointing a fiscal to them. Identified with a money related call choice, a genuine decision provides privilege but no commitment.

In addition to this, the case focuses on the financial matters of the motion picture business, as well as focusing on video making, circulation and show. It emphasizes on the financial aspects of motion pictures’ spin-offs, and it contains measures for incomes alongside creation and circulation costs for every film discharged in the assembled states by the real studios.

Arundel should purchase the rights to the movie’s sequel before the first film is made, or released without making artistic judgments. Moreover, the financial approach is derived by diversifying the risk by creating a portfolio.


Problem identification:

They would be occupied with purchasing the sequel rights for at least one studio. In addition to this, there would be complete production over an extended time of at least a year. It could be said that for example if a film becomes a hit and that Arundel thinks that making a sequel of the said film would be profitable, then it is possible that it would practice its rights by producing a sequel. On the other hand, they could offer the rights to the most important buyers. Inevitably, the execution of the first movies would not legitimize continuations, and for them, the spin-off rights would necessarily not work out. For most motion pictures, it has turned out to be very clear after their initial couple of weeks in theaters whether the sequel would be prudent or not based upon the film industry implementation.

It is of fundamental significance to Arundel that various movies and the cost for every film are settled upon before either Arundel or the studio become aware of which movies would create a choice of a spin-off. Furthermore, once the generation would begin, the studio would frame a sentiment regarding the motion picture and the likeliness that a spin-off would be conceivable. This would put Arundel off guard since it would then need to arrange the cost for spin-off rights on every film delivered while knowing a great deal not exactly about the generation studio but regarding the movie.

Investigation of Arundel's proposition incorporates a net present value computation of every motion picture organization. Arundel feels that holding up to purchase the continuation rights until after the film goes into production will make it more troublesome and exorbitant to purchase the rights. The following are the points of interest and hindrances of the approach.


  • All variable data was used, as well as there was a large sample in the analysis, as a result, our data would lead to a more accurate conclusion.
  • The company did not eliminate any outlier because it felt that outlier is the characteristic of the industry.
  • The analysis is based on historical data rather than fabricated assumptions.
  • The breaking down of the data by the studio is an advantage because it provides direction.


  • It is assumed that historical performance is inductive of future fulfillment in the short term based on historical data. It is expected that all the companies perform similarly over the period of time.
  • Only one-year historical data is available.
  • Motion picture creating organizations will offer continuation rights under the terms.
  • Probabilities of success have been calculated, however the company has not been able to apply them to a per film value. It has been identified that it is important to be subjective regarding the hazard in light of the probabilities of progress.

Arundel Partners Harvard Case Solution & Analysis


Option embedded in the sequel rights

Arundel would like to escape the threat of creating a film in the motion picture industry at the cost of purchasing the alternative to deliver potentially active spin-offs. Additionally, tastes are flighty, and expecting the success of any film was practically impossible. Hence, Arundel............

This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Share This


Save Up To




Register now and save up to 30%.