Up start Solar Systems Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Up start Solar Systems Case Study Analysis 

 Introduction

Alex Watt, holder of Upstart Solar Organizations in British Columbia, pursues support in generating a pattern for exact and positive estimates to potential suburban solar energy system consumers (Prehoda, 2019). With a manufacturing upbringing, Alex aims to endorse commerce while providing applicable financial information.

It's essential to highlight that in BC, additional solar energy production results in recognitions fed back into the hydro grid, valuable during shorter winter days. The use of "Smart" meters by BC Hydro enables the extent of electricity use and additional energy served into the grid (Sun et al., 2015).

Interpretation of Quantitative Calculated Data

With Step 01 Rate

The NPV is $16,362.82. This positive NPV specifies that the venture is predictable to create a net positive cash flow by the end of its period, which is a favorable outcome.

IRR

From the calculations shown in the below appendices, the calculated value of the IRR is 10%. The calculated percentage is the rate at which the (NPV) of the venture becomes equivalent to zero. An (IRR) of 10% is a positive sign, indicating that the task is likely to provide a profit higher than the value of the Cost of Capital.

Payback Period

The payback period is calculated to be 12.04 years. The calculated period determines that the corporation recovers its initial investment in 12.04 years. This period is also not too high for recovering the investment which means the project has also a favorable payback period.

With Step 02 Rate

NPV

The NPV is $28,431.58. This positive NPV specifies that the venture is predictable to create a net positive cash flow by the end of its period, which is a favorable outcome.

IRR

From the calculations shown in the below appendices, the calculated value of the (IRR) is 14%. The calculated percentage is the rate at which the (NPV) of the venture becomes equivalent to zero. An (IRR) of 14% is a positive sign, indicating that the task is likely to provide a profit higher than the value of the Cost of Capital.

Payback Period

The payback period is calculated to be 11.53 years. The calculated period determines that the company recover its initial investment in 11.53 years. This period is moderate for recovering the investment which means the project has also a favorable payback period.

Cumulative Cash Flow

The cumulative cash flow shows a consistent positive trend, reaching a substantial positive value over the project's duration. This indicates ongoing financial benefit and potential profitability.

Recommendations

The Upstart solar energy system project is financially healthy, with a positive NPV, favorable IRR, and rational payback period. It is recommended to continue with the project as it grips strong prospects for long-term profitability and positive returns. With an IRR of 14%, the project's return exceeds the 3% cost of capital, highlighting its financial attractiveness.

Conclusion

After calculating the NPV, IRR, and Payback period of the Upstart Solar Systems we conclude that the results shown in the interpretation of Steps 01 and 02 collectively indicate that the residential solar energy system project is financially viable and has the potential to provide positive returns to Upstart Solar Systems. The positive NPV, reasonable IRR, and relatively moderate payback period reflect the project's sound financial prospects, making it an attractive investment opportunity...........

This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Share This

SALE SALE

Save Up To

30%

IN ONLINE CASE STUDY

FOR FREE CASES AND PROJECTS INCLUDING EXCITING DEALS PLEASE REGISTER YOURSELF !!

Register now and save up to 30%.