The Road to War September 2002 to March 2003 Case Study Solution
The Road to War September 2002 to March 2003 is a case study of the American government's response to the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. It covers the problem statement, financial analysis, Porter's Five Forces, the PESTLE Analysis, and recommendations.
Problem Statement
The Road to War September 2002 to March 2003: The Challenges of Iraq is a CRS Report addressing the challenges of Iraq and its aftermath. It provides information on the origins of the conflict, the United States' military responses, and the broader international legal issues.
Although many European nations remain deeply concerned about the images of a destabilized Iraq, there have been signs that the opposition to the war may be softening. This could be because the overthrow of the Iraqi dictator has facilitated a more effective debate.
In the first months of the conflict, a large number of anti-war demonstrations took place in Europe and the United States. They were "massive," as one reporter put it. These demonstrations were widespread, and led to boycotts of U.S. products in some countries.
As the fighting in Iraq began, there were sharp protests in several cities, including San Francisco. There were also anti-war rallies in New York and other parts of the country.
Throughout the conflict, Congress remained largely silent. It was the armed forces that were the main hope for a check on executive branch mistakes. Nonetheless, a number of press accounts suggest divisions within the Administration.
The Bush Administration downplayed the need for regime change in Iraq. Despite repeated statements by President Bush that Iraq had little time left to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors, the Security Council imposed numerous deadlines. However, the Bush Administration never fully declared its intention to disarm Iraq, despite a long list of resolutions that called for this.
Case Study Solution
The United States went to war in Iraq on March 19, 2003. However, before the action began, it launched a massive diplomatic effort. It sought to establish a U.N. umbrella for its confrontation with the rogue state, and it dangled the promise of an end to Saddam Hussein's genocidal reign of terror. In the process, it sowed the seeds of anti-Americanism across the Middle East and the world at large.
As is often the case in diplomacy, the Bush Administration's goals were ambiguous. At the time, the United States was already involved in a large military build-up in the Persian Gulf. Some argue the country lacked the military capacity for a high tech campaign. Others argued there was a huge shortfall of humanitarian aid.
The Bush administration was not the only party to opine that the US needed to make a bigger splash in the Middle East. A few European nations had the same apprehensions. They felt that the United States was squandering a major opportunity to lay the groundwork for a credible allied coalition in Afghanistan.
The Washington Post-ABC News survey, for instance, found that a majority of Americans believe the U.S. has been in Iraq since 1941. Most believed the US has been engaged in a number of wars, and the invasion of Iraq was no exception.
Although the United States has been involved in numerous conflict zones in the past, it has been less than ecstatic with the results. On the other hand, its armed forces are currently assisting the Afghans in their quest for freedom.
Porters Five Forces
The aforementioned title mentioned above isn't the only thing in the carre sex ts et sex category. Let's get into the nitty gritty of the subject, the big five. If you want to be an effective logistics manager, you need to take the necessary steps to prevent these little buggers from sabotaging you. The best way to do this is to put a plan into action. Using a logistics management plan will ensure your company is ready to weather the storm and not be the next victim of a bad contract. Having an organized logistics management plan will also ensure that you do not have to take on a plethora of employees to get the job done. This will in turn free up your resources to focus on more critical activities such as customer service.
You will need to do the following steps to ensure that the best possible customer service is delivered to you: a) Determine what you are actually selling and b) Determine how your customers buy and store their products. This will ensure that you can deliver a superior service. Lastly, make sure to implement a process to collect feedback on your customer's shopping habits. After all, customer feedback is the best way to determine if you are providing your customers with the best service possible.
PESTLE Analysis
The PESTEL acronym stands for political, economic, social, technological and legal factors. Its purpose is to make sense of these factors and devise a strategy to deal with them in a timely manner. While the PESTEL acronym may not be the biggest hurdle in your arsenal, a well-crafted plan can make all the difference between success and failure. If you are looking for a reputable consulting firm to help you craft a sound strategy, do not hesitate to give us a call. We will gladly answer your questions and do a free review of your organization's data to recommend a suitable consulting service. With a little planning and research, you can reap the rewards of the good life. Just remember that you are in good company. Be sure to check out our services page and make an appointment today! Getting started is easy! Take a few minutes to learn more about how we can improve your bottom line! Whether you are a small, medium, or large business, you are in good hands! Whether you are an employee, a client, or an investor, we are here to listen and offer the best in customer service.
Financial Analysis
The cost of a war with Iraq can't be determined with any certainty. Estimates vary widely. However, the costs can be attributed to various factors, including escalating oil prices and the lingering impact of the war on American military personnel and their families. In the grand scheme of things, the cost of a war in Iraq is likely to be a fraction of the costs of the Gulf War of the 1990s.
The United States has been in a state of tense since March 2003, when the Bush administration announced its intent to "end the threat posed by Iraq's continued defiance of UN Security Council resolutions." There was also a large military buildup in the Persian Gulf in the months preceding the declaration. On the other hand, anti-war demonstrators demonstrated in the United States and around the world. The number of demonstrations was a record high, a reflection of the mood.
One of the more interesting and more challenging questions to answer is how much will the cost of a war with Iraq actually cost the American taxpayer. This question is particularly pertinent because the United States relies on Iraqi oil for a significant portion of its fuel supply. A recent report from the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the largest military organization in the nation, estimates that the cost of a war with Iraq could range from $40 billion to $90 billion. That number is likely to increase over time as the cost of Iraqi oil increases.
Recommendations
During the months of September 2002 to March 2003, the Bush Administration and its supporters worked toward achieving a number of goals. They wanted to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and to start economic reconstruction. The Administration also emphasized regime change.
In a speech on March 17, 2003, President Bush gave Saddam Hussein a deadline to leave the country. By the end of that year, all major population centers would be under the U.S.'s control.
Several nations offered military contributions. Britain, Spain, and Germany were among those that agreed. Russia supported the effort. China opposed the use of force.
After the fighting began, large anti-war demonstrations took place in numerous cities around the world. There were also sharp protests in the United States and San Francisco.
In the weeks leading up to the war, aid organizations arranged for emergency supplies and planned for the humanitarian needs of Iraqis. These plans included establishing bases in Iraq to help with relief operations. However, the continued instability in the region has prevented an assessment of the country's needs.
The Bush Administration argued that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a threat and that it was in material violation of seventeen United Nations Security Council resolutions. It maintained that Iraq possessed active WMD programs that could be used for terrorist purposes.
Earlier Security Council resolutions provided sufficient authority for the use of force. The Bush Administration emphasized that Iraq had not yet declared its WMD programs. Therefore, it could not wait until it made further progress.
This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
Airbus A3XX: Developing the Worlds Largest Commercial Jet (A)
Meeting the Diversity Challenge at PepsiCo: The Steve Reinemund Era
Social media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix
Cirque du Soleil–The High-Wire Act of Building Sustainable Partnerships
HubSpot: Inbound Marketing and Web 2.0
Symbian Google & Apple in the Mobile Space (A)
Sanctuary Soft: International Expansion Strategies
U.S. Subprime Mortgage Crisis: Policy Reactions (B)
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
HP: The Computer is Personal Again
