Revenue Flow And Human Rights: A Paradox For Shell Nigeria Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

IMD-2-0084 © 2006
Steger, Ulrich; Ionescu-Somers, Aileen

The case describes Shell’s evolution within the context of sensitive human rights issues associated with exploitation and oil exploration in Nigeria. Given that much of the revenue from Nigerian oil resources was being “ siphoned” off by corrupt state governors; the case centers on problems relevant to corruption and government transparency. It describes Shell’s engagement in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and its cooperation together with the Nigerian Government to instigate a more transparent reporting on petroleum revenues.

Learning objective: Participants learn about its own effect on human rights and the invasive character of corruption; but more specifically about the role of a multinational versus the function of the government when trying to deal with such issues. Players will even learn a whole lot about the sophistication of sustainability issues for corporations; particularly human rights; dilemmas. There is also learning about the range and limits of corporate responsibility; and the difficulties that all players confront on demanding market conditions -degree playing field”. Players can develop new insights on ways of creating valuable partnerships working responsibly and interacting in a global; but responsible; context.

Revenue Flow And Human Rights A Paradox For Shell Nigeria case study solution

Subjects: Sustainability; Social responsibility; Human rights; Corruption; Transparency
Settings: Nigeria; Oil & Gas; 112;000 employees – Revenues of $306 billion in 2005; Events from the start of Shell’s interventions in Nigeria 1937; up to September 2006

Revenue Flow And Human Rights: A Paradox For Shell Nigeria Case Solution Other Similar Case Solutions like

Revenue Flow And Human Rights: A Paradox For Shell Nigeria

Share This