Collaborative Entrepreneurship in the Fight to Eliminate Malaria Deaths Case Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies

Collaborative Entrepreneurship in the Fight to Eliminate Malaria Deaths Case Solution

The fight to eliminate malaria deaths is a cause that is both important and pressing. This is why there is a great need for a collaborative entrepreneurial approach. With this approach, there is a better chance of a successful result. As such, this article will take you through the process of a Case Study Analysis of this issue.

Problem Statement

The quest to find a cure for malaria is a global endeavour and the United States is no different. With an estimated 241 million cases of malaria in the year ahead, America can play a major role in the fight against this ailment, from the frontline to the bedside. One of the biggest challenges to the cause is ensuring adequate funding, supply chain, and health workforce readiness. A robust stumbling block is the unpredictable effects of climate change. Fortunately, there are many solutions to this problem. Among them, the best way to tackle the challenge is to engage a variety of stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, private sector companies, and the general public. Having an ecosystem in place to share information, ideas, and resources will help accelerate the quest to find a cure for malaria.

In the quest to find a cure for malaria, it is also worthwhile to consider how to reduce the disease's scourge through prevention. One approach is to provide mosquito borne vaccines, as this is one of the most effective methods for combating this mosquito related disease. Other approaches include improving the data and supply systems to maximize effectiveness of interventions, and leveraging partnerships with other malarial countries to leverage common interests.

Case Study Solution

Malaria is a public health problem that affects over half the world's population. The disease is caused by the bite of an insect-transmitted parasite. There are a number of ways to prevent malaria, including mosquito netting, limiting access to mosquito breeding sites, and treating the parasite. However, sporadic outbreaks remain a threat.

Many countries are moving towards eradication, and a few are currently certified as malaria-free. El Salvador is the first country in Central America to be free of malaria. Sri Lanka's malaria-free certification in 2010 inspired other nations to work towards the same goal.

A key challenge in eliminating malaria in South Africa is the cross-border migration of cases from high-burden countries. The importation of cases fuels local transmission. This is why source reduction in Southern Mozambique is necessary.

The WHO has led efforts to secure sustainable solutions to this global health concern. It recently convened an advisory group of leading public health experts and scientists to address this issue. These experts reviewed a wide range of potential strategies. Although the group recognized that eradication was still a long way from being realized, it affirmed the commitment to securing the necessary resources.

The case study presented in this article provides a cost-benefit analysis of achieving malaria elimination in South Africa. The results demonstrate that achieving this target is financially viable. By eliminating the disease, South Africa can improve its regional efforts and enhance global health security.

Porters Five Forces

One of the biggest challenges in public health today is the fight against malaria. Malaria is caused by mosquitoes, and is a global disease. To date, there have been a number of successful campaigns to fight the disease, and most endemic countries in Latin America have seen a major reduction in cases and deaths. But to achieve the goal, sustained nation-level financial support is necessary. Fortunately, the World Health Organization has put forward a plan to fight malaria by 2030, albeit with a few teething problems.

The main challenge is getting the proper funding, and the corresponding political will to match. In the past, the United States has been the leading donor of global malaria funding, and the World Bank is currently the leading global backer of the program. Aside from monetary contributions, the WHO's global efforts require technical assistance and training to implement a comprehensive and effective malaria control program. As of May 2018, a total of 159,740 individuals were estimated to have died from malaria, a 61.2% reduction over the previous year. Some of the most notable success stories include Venezuela and Ethiopia.

An interesting study from Harvard Business School demonstrated that a randomized control trial involving a group of malaria-free volunteers in Ethiopia, compared with a matched control group, saw a significant reduction in the prevalence of malaria, as well as improvements in subjective ratings of participants. Similarly, a pilot study in Colombia showed that a combination of malaria control efforts, including vaccination, ad hoc treatment and a combination of a telemedicine approach and traditional care, reduced transmission and associated health costs by more than 50 percent.

PESTLE Analysis

The Mosquito Network's quest to end malaria in a timely and economical fashion has spawned a handful of spinoffs. While the mainstay is the stoic stalwart it is, other than the ottowa it's not as tough as it looks, its offsprings are a delight. To help them along, the network has enlisted the aid of a swag of tycoons. Among the group, a few notable names have been spotted. Some have taken on the mantle of leadership. Others have been tasked with the heavy lifting of churning out a few innovative malaria cures. As such, it's a good idea to keep a pulse on the movers and shakers.

Financial Analysis

The South African Investment Case was developed by the National Malaria Programme (NMP) to identify the costs and benefits of malaria elimination in South Africa. This case was designed to inform the malaria programme's budgeting and advocacy efforts.

The case was developed in collaboration with international partners. It provided evidence that malaria elimination in South Africa is cost-effective and feasible. Through a robust political commitment, the government committed substantial domestic resources to control the disease.

By developing a detailed economic model, the case outlined how much malaria elimination in South Africa would cost. The case evaluated the total economic burden of the disease as a share of the GDP of three endemic provinces.

The case was developed using data from the National Malaria Programme and the South African National Treasury. In addition, epidemiological and financial data was collected. A mathematical transmission model was then developed to simulate different malaria elimination scenarios.

The total economic burden of malaria in the country was calculated as a direct cost to the household, as well as an indirect cost to society. While the case is focused on malaria elimination in South Africa, the methodology could be used for other low-income and middle-income countries to estimate the total cost reductions needed to achieve elimination.

After assessing the total economic burden of malaria, an economic model was developed that estimated the costs of malaria elimination in South Africa between 2018 and 2030. These costs were inflated to mid-year 2020 prices.

Recommendations

The fight to eliminate malaria deaths continues. It requires the dedication of the political and financial leaders. To strengthen the global eradication goal, innovative financing mechanisms and increased government spending are key. New tools and technologies are in the pipeline, such as sensitive rapid diagnostic tests, next-generation vector control methods, and radical treatments. However, eradication is far from a sure thing.

The CHAI, or Collaboration for Health Advancement in Africa, is a group of over 20 African countries working together to achieve malaria elimination. Their programs include surveillance, testing, treatment, and reclaimed land.

Eliminating malaria in one country may reduce transmission and provide regional benefits. For example, migrant laborers and soldiers are screened before entering a malaria-eliminating country. Children and adults in the region are surveyed at school and antenatal clinics to detect malaria.

Eliminating malaria in neighboring countries can accelerate the elimination process, permanently reducing transmission. In addition, it can be more cost effective for malaria elimination efforts to take place in countries with less malaria incidence.

Malaria remains a significant and costly burden on the world. These costs can be broken down into various categories: lost days of work, travel to dispensaries and clinics, and treatment at clinics. Other costs include burial expenses and the purchase of drugs for home use.

Malaria imposes substantial costs on governments. While some of these costs have been accounted for in studies on estimating the economic loss of malaria, many more have yet to be quantified.

This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Collaborative Entrepreneurship in the Fight to Eliminate Malaria Deaths Harvard Case Solution & Analysis