Showdown at Cracker Barrel Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

In the autumn of 2011, activist investor, Sardar Biglari, has got nearly 10% possession in the Cracker Barrel restaurant chain.

He believes that senior management and the board have failed and the business has underperformed relative to its peers. Biglari starts a proxy fight in an effort to win a board place and alter the course of the strategy of Cracker Barrel, when he's denied a seat on the board.

They are undecided on supporting Biglari two leading proxy advisory companies, ISS and Glass Lewis, differ. Shareholders must decide.

Showdown at Cracker Barrel case study soluton

PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 2014 PRODUCT #: 114026-PDF-ENG

This is just an excerpt. This case is about FINANCE & ACCOUNTING

Showdown at Cracker Barrel Case Solution Other Similar Case Solutions like

Showdown at Cracker Barrel

Share This