Overcoming Political Opposition: Compressed Natural Gas Mandates in Delhi (C) Case Solution
In 1985, M.C. Mehta, a legal representative and head of his own ecological NGO, submitted a public interest lawsuits (PIL) in the Supreme Court of India to impose the 1981 Air (Avoidance and The upper hand of Contamination) Act in the environments of India's International Capital Area (NCR). In 1988, World Bank specialists had actually encouraged the Indian federal government that provided the level to which air contamination in the National Capital Area originated from a progressively big fleet of guest lorries, an efficient policy would be to mandate reasonably tidy compressed gas (CNG) in mass transit automobiles. Although the federal government had actually actively thought about a series of policies, it had actually cannot execute any. At the early 1990s, New Delhi was the fourth-most contaminated city on the planet. By June 1998, the sub-particulate matter level in Delhi's air was 3 times higher than the requirements set by India's Central Contamination Control panel.
Knowing Goal
This case draws lessons on handling political rewards from an amazing policy reform-- the effective application of compressed gas (CNG) mandates, regardless of prevalent personal interest group opposition, in all mass transit automobiles in Delhi in between 2001 and 2002. It is planned for usage in a course on the political and legal environment of company, and is taught in the context of the 4Is structure-- offering an intro to interest group analysis and distributive politics.
This is just an excerpt. This case is about Business
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
United Cereal: Lora Brills Eurobrand Challeng
Business Plan The Stone Appeal Jewelers
Who Is This Guy?
Organizational Inclusion
Leica Camera: A “Boutique” Firm Faces a World of Change
Giordano International: Sustained Success Beyond 2005
Levi Strauss & Co. (C)
Silkor Laser Medical Center
A-CAT Corp.
Ajax Petroleum
