Bidding for Hertz: Leveraged Buyout Case Study Solution
Introduction
Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs) are financial transactions in which a company is purchased with an important extent of on-loan money, using the assets of the corporation being attained as a guarantee for the loans (Susan, 2009). The determination of an LBO is to permit corporations to create great achievements without having to obligate a lot of their investment. It’s important to note that LBOs are complex financial arrangements that involve substantial risks and rewards for all parties involved, including the acquiring company, investors, and creditors.
The success of an LBO often depends on the capability of the acquired company to produce enough cash flow to meet its debt obligations and other financial commitments. Hertz filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May 2020 due to the economic challenges brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. After the bankruptcy, Hertz went through a restructuring process to address its financial issues and remained an independent entity within the car rental industry.
Is Hertz an applicable acquisition target?
Hertz has measured the worthy leveraged acquisition target because it has constant cash flows as well as an annual compound growth rate of 7.6%. The constant cash flows and annual rate specify that the Hertz Corporation has a good financial position and performance at the time of leverage and for the future. Hertz maintains its strong customer base.
The customers only like to use the vehicles of Hertz on rent and also have no desire to switch from Hertz to other competitors in the market. The management team of the company is also too good which maintains a strong customer base. The team of Hertz facilitates customers in every aspect when they face an issue regarding vehicles or equipment. The team of Hertz gain a competitive edge in the market because they have strong business and industry knowledge.
Stable cash flows generated from operating activities specify that the company can pay its interest expense and also repay the principal amount. The company has strong special purpose vehicles (SPV) assets that attract more investment through debt financing by expending the assets warranty, which has little cost as well as great debt for the corporation. Hertz Corporation has adapted to the perfect LBO objective over the pretax profit and financial presentation then 1967.
Additional motive falsehoods in the revenue development between 1985 and 2005 with annual growth at a compound rate of 7.6%. The administration team is another cause after they follow the explanation. The management team provides a hand in the information about the business. There is an opportunity for the present CEO to be exchanged by an operative and knowledgeable director who would end up supervising the investment convention and cash flow while altering them in line with the corporation’s objectives. With the eye-catching top, it becomes an appropriate buyout target.
Key Assumptions
The key expectations revealed in Exhibits 8, 9, and 10 are very accurate and specific to the stoppage in the rental market, in which Hertz functions its estimated presentation as an outcome. The assumptions with the leading influence are the 4.5% slow growth in car rental and its steadiness at that proportion, as well as the maintenance of the apparatus rental progress at a rate of 3%.
Return Estimates based on the Terminal Value
The conventions of lesser growth rates in incomes have a straight relation with the predictable return of the stockholders. If the estimated growth rate of returns is lower, it will decrease the estimated return of stockholders. Created on the valuations that are well-defined in the case exhibits 8, 9, and 10 laterally with the intentions of terminal value and terminal growth rate, the estimated return of stockholders is found 18.8%, which is measured standard from this security. The intentions of terminal growth rate are founded on the appraisals that are delivered in case exhibits by seeing the year 2005 as the base year.
Target Return of 20%
Meanwhile, Carlyle has requirements for a 20 percent Return on Investment, as it is recommended by the investigation that $2.3 billion is relatively adequate for the 20% return, due to the circumstance that the return on security incline to be constructed on the incremental variations in returns and investments in operating cost.
Such innovative guidelines and approaches have been suggested to upturn the incomes so that the advanced truthful equity share would not former influence on the produced profit. Subsequently, the corporation should deliver the rational equity share that would maximum expected produce the rational return for the stockholders..........
This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.
Related Case Solutions & Analyses:
From Mental Models to Transformation: Overcoming Inhibitors to Change
Comcast New England: Journey of Organizational Transformation
Infosys (A): Strategic Human Resource Management
Columbias Final Mission
GEs Talent Machine: The Making of a CEO
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd.: Chasing a Daring Vision
Verizon Communications Inc.: Implementing a Human Resources Balanced Scorecard
JetBlue Airways: Starting from Scratch
Data to Knowledge to Results: Building an Analytic Capability
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
