Rough Justice: Stuart Eizenstat and Holocaust-era Asset Restitution (A) Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Beginning in 1994, a series of articles and public disclosures signaled that Swiss banks might have kept assets belonging to victims of the Holocaust, and also could have engaged in long-term efforts to block survivors' ability to recover those assets after the Second World War.

Stuart Eizenstat, a longtime government administrator, and the U.S. Special Envoy for Property Restitution, assumed a composite multi-year concession between victims' council, advocacy grouping, government administrator, and the banks in an unparalleled attempt to get hold of restitution for the victims.

Unifying fractous parties within a blurred legal, social, and business landscape, Eizenstat used a exclusive approach of quantifying "rough justice" in order to apply the accountability of corporate entities and governments for past injustices in Switzerland, which outline the base of this learning.

Rough Justice Stuart Eizenstat and Holocaust-era Asset Restitution (A) case study solution

PUBLICATION DATE: March 29, 2013 PRODUCT #: 913037-HCB-ENG

This is just an excerpt. This case is about GLOBAL BUSINESS

Rough Justice: Stuart Eizenstat and Holocaust-era Asset Restitution (A) Case Solution Other Similar Case Solutions like

Rough Justice: Stuart Eizenstat and Holocaust-era Asset Restitution (A)

Share This